{"id":7633,"date":"2013-10-20T16:50:43","date_gmt":"2013-10-20T16:50:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ramworks.net\/blog\/?p=7633"},"modified":"2015-10-25T19:58:30","modified_gmt":"2015-10-25T19:58:30","slug":"testing-hunting-rifle-accuracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/testing-hunting-rifle-accuracy\/","title":{"rendered":"Testing Hunting Rifle Accuracy"},"content":{"rendered":"

When it comes to evaluating the accuracy of your rifle, how many groups of how many shots each should you fire? This has been a long-standing argument among rifle shooters and you\u2019ll find that different gun magazines offer different evaluation standards depending on the gun, chambering and range.<\/p>\n

\"Five<\/a>
Five shot groups are an accepted norm when it comes to accuracy testing.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

For example, I review a number of rifles each year for the National Rifle Association\u2019s American Rifleman magazine. Their testing criteria for center fire rifles requires that I shoot five, five shot groups from a solid rest at 100 yards. Generally, they report the best group, the worst group and the average.<\/p>\n

With rimfire rifles the test protocol is different. They require five, 10 shot groups to be fired at 50 yards from a solid rest. The same results \u2013 the best, worst and average are reported.<\/p>\n

Harris publications testing protocol for rifles require that each rifle be tested at 100 yards and that three, five shot groups be fired. Generally, regardless of the publication, a sampling of at least three loads from three different manufactures is required.<\/p>\n

From a reader\u2019s standpoint, I\u2019m not sure how relevant any of this really is unless all the results are really good or really bad or just average. I\u2019ve been shooting long enough to know that just because one rifle will shoot itty-bitty or really bad groups with one load means very little. Rifles and ammo are like people; some combinations just do not mix well. On the other hand, if a rifle shoots all three loads very well or very bad, you could consider that a reasonable indication of how that rifle shoots.<\/p>\n

For those of us who want to conduct an accuracy test to determine how well a particular load \u2013 factory or handload \u2013 will shoot out of our rifle, our testing is specific for a single combination. You may want to determine if a certain load is accurate enough for hunting, for match shoot or for personal defense. You will probably have your own minimum performance standard and what that is or should be is another subject entirely.<\/p>\n

\"Should<\/a>
Should you ever use a 10 shot group to evaluate accuracy?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The question before us is how many groups of how many shots do you need to fire to answer your question? I wondered the same thing, just because a certain magazine demands a certain protocol, or because a certain test method has become accepted does not necessarily mean it is the only way to answer a question.<\/p>\n

And, to further complicate the process, if you engage in shooting competitions where you must shoot the best 10-shot group possible, then that is the way you should test your ammo. The same type testing procedure could also be advisable if you’re testing ammo for a high volume varmint shooting. On the other hand, if you are testing ammo for your deer rifle, its ability to shoot 10 consecutive shots into the same hole is, well, immaterial. In most cases a deer rifle needs to fire no more than three accurate shots in a row.<\/p>\n

Point being; conduct your testing based on the application. If you are not writing a review for a magazine that demands a certain test protocol, then who cares what they think.<\/p>\n

To get an idea of how different the results would be if different testing protocols were used, I conducted an experiment with two good shooting .22 rifles at 50 yards. The following groups were fired with each rifle:<\/p>\n

\"Group<\/a>1 \u2013 20 shot group<\/p>\n

1 \u2013 10 shot group<\/p>\n

5 \u2013 five shot groups<\/p>\n

5 \u2013 three shot groups<\/p>\n

5 \u2013 two shot groups<\/p>\n

5 \u2013 two shots groups<\/p>\n

This totals 22 groups and 110 shots. Averages were established for the multiple group tests as well as an overall average for all 22 groups. And, the two, five, two shots group tests were combined to provide data for a 10, two-shot group test. What did I learn?<\/p>\n

\"When<\/a>
When American Rifleman magazine tests .22 rifles they use 10-shot groups as opposed to five.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

By comparing each test protocol to the over all average it was found that with both rifles the five, three-shot group test was the closest to the overall average. Maybe the most interesting discovery was that I generally fired at least one bad group out of five or at a minimum, one bad shot out of 20.<\/p>\n

Shooter skill is an important element of the equation because none of us are Walt Berger<\/a> perfect. Even if you have a perfect bench set up you are going to make a bad shot. And, that bad shot will ruin the group it was in. The problem is, it can be impossible to sometimes identify if a particular bad shot was actually caused by you. For this reason, firing a single group<\/em><\/strong> of any number of shots is not a reliable evaluation. Consider this too; the bad shot you make, might actually correct a shot that would have went wide due to the ammo \/ rifle combination.<\/p>\n

The hard to quantify human element is why the more groups you shoot<\/em>, regardless of the number of shots per group, is more important. However, once you start firing more than five shots per group, the chances for each group to include a bad shot due to your shooting increases exponentially.<\/p>\n

\"Most<\/a>
Most shooters cannot fire 10 consecutive shots without making a mistake.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As a friend used to say, anyone can shoot nine good shots in a row, its that tenth one that\u2019s a bitch. Think about it, how many great five shot groups have you ruined with the last shot?<\/p>\n

When it comes to conducting an evaluation of my personal rifles I use three-shot groups most of the time. But, I do not get all bent out of shape about the exact size of each group. Instead, I establish a benchmark of performance that I expect or feel I need for each application. I then start shooting three shot groups. If the rifle and I can keep 80% of the three shot groups fired (four out of five) within the standard I have set, I quit worrying about accuracy or the exact size of each group<\/em> and move on. This means that I can, with confidence determine the accuracy potential of a particular load by shooting less than a box of ammo. If my standard is 1.5 inches at 100 yards and the first two groups measure more than that, I\u2019m done. No reason to test that ammo any longer.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Nothing<\/a>
Nothing wrong with three-shot groups. IF you fire enough of them.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

This is exactly what I did with a Ruger Model 77 International in .250 Savage that I picked up for a steal. The rifle had some problems with bedding and the trigger was terrible. I could not get three shots to cluster inside two inches. My intention was to use the rifle for whitetails here in the West Virginia hills and as long as it would consistently shoot three shots into sub 1.5 MOA groups, that was all I needed.<\/p>\n

\"This<\/a>
This single five-shot group confirms what four, three-shot groups had previously proven about this load.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

After working on the rifle\u2019s stock and bedding, and after installing a Timney trigger<\/a>, I started handloading for it. The first load I tried, 35 grains of H4895 behind a 100 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip, which left the barrel at just a shade over 2800 fps, printed four, thee-shot groups in a row at 100 yards and they all measured less than 1.5 inches. In 12 shots I was done, no use to fire another group, which would have likely included the bad shot I was destined to make.<\/p>\n

The other day I decided it was time to double check this rifle\u2019s zero before hunting season so I stepped out to the bench and fired one, five-shot group at 100 yards. I took my time to make sure every shot was broken as clean as possible. The resulting five-shot group measured 1.38 inches.<\/p>\n

Proof of concept!<\/p>\n

\"When<\/a>
When it comes to hunting, how you’ll shoot your rifle from field shooting positions is really what matters.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

For hunting rifles, as long as four out of five of your three-shot, bench rest groups are within your performance mandate, you\u2019re good to go. But you know what? For hunting rifles, your bench rest groups mean nothing unless you have a good bench you carry along in the woods with you. Nope, for hunting rifles its more important that you evaluate your and your rifle\u2019s ability from field shooting positions.<\/p>\n

How do you do that? Well, that\u2019s another thing altogether.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When it comes to evaluating the accuracy of your rifle, how many groups of how many shots each should you fire? This has been a long-standing argument among rifle shooters and you\u2019ll find that different gun magazines offer different evaluation standards depending on the gun, chambering and range. For example, I review a number of rifles each year for the National Rifle …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2522],"tags":[302,303,304,305],"class_list":["post-7633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hunt","tag-rifle-accuracy","tag-shots-per-group","tag-testing-ammo","tag-testing-rifles"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5hujZ-1Z7","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10735,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/ultra-light-hunting-rifle-stories\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":0},"title":"Ultra Light Hunting Rifle Stories","author":"gunwriter","date":"December 9, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Most of the stories you hear about good hunting rifles\u00a0involve itty-bitty groups or ridiculously\u00a0long and difficult shots. This is because that's really all there is to tell about most hunting rifles. There is an exception and that's the rifles from New Ultra Light Arms.\u00a0In\u00a01985, New Ultra Light Arms started the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HUNTING"","block_context":{"text":"HUNTING","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/hunt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NULA-1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/NULA-11.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/NULA-11.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/NULA-11.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/NULA-11.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":14250,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/i-have-this-rifle\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":1},"title":"I Have This Rifle","author":"gunwriter","date":"February 27, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"There are five rifles from New Ultra Light Arms\u00a0(NULA) that live in my house. I could not bring myself to part with any of them. My NULA 22 LR is a single shot. It has potted a lot of squirrels and I used it on Christmas day to shoot my\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "EDITORIAL"","block_context":{"text":"EDITORIAL","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/editorial\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"35 Zebra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/35-Zebra.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/35-Zebra.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/35-Zebra.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/35-Zebra.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13336,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/scout-rifle-shangri-la-happy-birthday-jeff-cooper\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":2},"title":"Scout Rifle Shangri-La – Happy Birthday Jeff Cooper","author":"gunwriter","date":"May 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"It is only fitting this post happen today. You see, today is Jeff Cooper\u2019s birthday. In the late 60s Cooper began experimenting with lightweight bolt-action carbines. Greatly influenced by the life and writings of Frederick Russell Burnham, Cooper envisioned this general-purpose rifle as, \u201c\u2026a short, light, handy, versatile, utility rifle.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DEFENSE"","block_context":{"text":"DEFENSE","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/defense\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CC-11","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/CC-11.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/CC-11.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/CC-11.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/CC-11.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":11185,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/prediction-2015-is-the-year-of-the-scout-rifle\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":3},"title":"Prediction: 2015 is the Year of the Scout Rifle","author":"gunwriter","date":"January 19, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 Savage Introduces a new Scout Rifle and they are not the only company to do so. Savage 11 Scout Rifle Direct from the Savage press release: Light. Fast-handling. Easy to get on target and place accurate shots in real-world conditions. The new Savage Arms\u2122 11 Scout Rifle combines all\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DEFENSE"","block_context":{"text":"DEFENSE","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/defense\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Scout_rifle","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Scout_rifle.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Scout_rifle.png?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Scout_rifle.png?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Scout_rifle.png?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13260,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/mossbergs-wicked-375\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":4},"title":"Mossberg’s Wicked 375","author":"gunwriter","date":"April 21, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"In the world of big game cartridges there\u2019s this notion that bigger is always better. There\u2019s also a segment of the hunting public that firmly believes velocity is what kills. Weird like\u00a0I am, I don\u2019t belong to either camp. However, I\u2019ve done enough work with real ballisticians to know that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HUNTING"","block_context":{"text":"HUNTING","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/hunt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"375-1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/375-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/375-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/375-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/375-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":16423,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/long-rifles-and-round-balls\/","url_meta":{"origin":7633,"position":5},"title":"Long Rifles and Round Balls","author":"gunwriter","date":"December 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"If you\u2019re a student of the rifle or a muzzleloading enthusiast this is a time machine you must ride. The journey spans over 200 years covering five generations, but unlike histories that examine most rifles, those you\u2019ll discover here are, perhaps, out of your reach. To quote COL. Townsend Whelen,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Empty Cases Exclusive"","block_context":{"text":"Empty Cases Exclusive","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/empty-cases-exclusive\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/SI18.jpg?fit=1000%2C501&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/SI18.jpg?fit=1000%2C501&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/SI18.jpg?fit=1000%2C501&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/SI18.jpg?fit=1000%2C501&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7633"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7633\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12556,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7633\/revisions\/12556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}