{"id":11529,"date":"2015-04-14T13:45:20","date_gmt":"2015-04-14T13:45:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/?p=11529"},"modified":"2015-10-24T03:14:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-24T03:14:00","slug":"forget-the-bullet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/forget-the-bullet\/","title":{"rendered":"Forget the Bullet"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Bullet-4<\/a><\/p>\n

There is a serious lack of understanding when it comes to terminal ballistics. This holds true whether we are talking about shooting animals or bad guys. A recent Facebook discussion resulted in a blog post<\/a> by my esteemed colleague and arguing partner, Bryce Towsley<\/a>. I don\u2019t agree with everything in his post \u2013 surprise \u2013 but there are some valid and factual points. When someone has shot as much game with as many different things as Bryce, he deserves a listen.<\/p>\n

As an almost lifelong student of terminal ballistics I\u2019ve learned some things too. What I\u2019m about to suggest will likely come as a surprise, particularly since for most of my writing career I\u2019ve been measuring and reporting on bullets recovered from various test medias and animals. I\u2019ve concluded that recovered bullets are practically useless. For starters, they are not made of gold and we are not going to reuse them. 200 years ago mountain men melted their recovered lead balls and in the future, given some apocalyptic event, we might do the same. Until that time, what\u2019s the point?<\/p>\n

Pass-Throughs<\/h4>\n

If you shoot a whitetail deer and it falls down and dies or runs 75 yards and dies, the recovered bullet will tell you very little. In fact, very few bullets will be stopped by a whitetail unless raking shots are taken. Those pass-throughs are unrecoverable so all a recovered bullet really tells you is that it did not pass through. Now some may argue they want to recover the bullet to see if it expanded. Um, if it does not expand the chances of recovering it are slim to none. Non-expanded bullets are hard to stop.<\/p>\n

Mushrooms<\/h4>\n

Secondly, this mushroom formation we all look for in expanded bullets only really leads to comments about how pretty a bullet looks. Pretty bullets do not kill; bullets that damage tissues kill. In fact, the prettier the bullet, the less tissue it is likely to have damaged. You see, bullets are really simple machines designed to impart energy inside a creature. The less the bullet deforms, the less energy it imparts.<\/p>\n

\"Bullet-1\"<\/a>
A prettier mushroom would be hard to find. But, what does a pretty mushroom\u00a0mean?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Recovered Weight<\/h4>\n

Similarly, the idea that recovered weight means anything is just as misleading. Admittedly, it sounds good that a bullet retained all of its weight, that means its tough. Right? And, bullets that we are pushing into creatures at high velocity should be tough. Right? Yes and no. Some creatures are tough and big and need bullets that penetrate deep. Bullets that destroy lots of tissue get mangled and fail to penetrate deep. Not so much because they lose weight but more often because they deform into a shape with a large frontal diameter. A 25% increase in frontal diameter will reduce penetration more than a 25% increase in weight retention will increase it. Years of test data supports this.<\/p>\n

So why do we \u2013 hunters \u2013 and especially gun writers worship recovered bullets and measure every aspect of them? Mostly because we don\u2019t have anything else to measure. Wound cavities in animals or gelatin are difficult to analyze. In fact, with all but a few exceptions it is near impossible to look in a gel block or an animal and determine the bullet or cartridge that was used. Humans are addicted to numbers and in the absence of being able to measure damage we measure the thing that caused the damage.<\/p>\n

Pardon the nastiness of the analogy but that makes about as much sense as looking in the toilet to determine the quality of your last meal.<\/p>\n

\"Bullet-5\"<\/a>
Is 100% weight retention a good thing? It depends. Sure make for a pretty bullet.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What Really Matters?<\/h4>\n

So how should we evaluate or measure terminal performance? I think there are two good ways. The first is how effective a bullet is at killing an animal. Granted, this is akin to marrying a woman you have never met but it is after all the real test. Regardless of everything else if a bullet of any caliber, size, weight or shape reliably kills animals quickly, it is suitable to the task.<\/p>\n

A recent whitetail cull hunt in Texas is a perfect example. I shot 14 deer with the same bullet and the only two deer I could put down in their tracks were purposely spine shot. I got tired of 100 plus yard blood trails! All bullets passed through the deer and all deer died within the usual 20 seconds. They just ran too far for my liking, especially in the rattlesnake infested brush country of east Texas.<\/p>\n

\"Bullet-3\"<\/a>
This bullet retained 100% of its weight but only deposited about 50% of its energy in the first six inches of penetration. It did penetrate very deep.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Conversely, I\u2019ve used another type bullet of the same weight and caliber, pushed at the same velocity to take sable, waterbuck, impala, blesbok and whitetail. All of these animals dropped at the shot and 20 seconds later were dead. What was the difference in these bullets? Aside from their construction, it was the way these bullets lost energy.<\/p>\n

Recent experimental testing has shown that the first bullet only lost about 50% of its energy in the first few inches of penetration. The second bullet lost about 25% more. The result is the bang flop we all like to see and the only logical explanation is that it was the result of that energy loss.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, if you push low energy depositing bullets really fast, they often drop animals too. Could it be that there is a time-distance threshold of energy release that is needed to make this happen?<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\"Bullet-2\"<\/a>
This bullet lost about 25% of tis weight but dumped more than 75% of its weight in the first six inches of penetration. Did it penetrate deep enough?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Now, I\u2019m not saying the energy dump or transfer is what caused this. (I might be wrong but we are not dealing with a lot of energy here.) What I\u2019m saying is that the way the bullet reacted to impact with the animal caused more trauma and damage over a shorter distance. The result was that the animal had a subconscious reaction to that trauma \u2013 it fell down \u2013 and therefore the 20 seconds of oxygen its brain had left did not allow it to get very far away. What I’m really trying to do is get you to think about what happens when a bullet hits the bone.<\/em><\/p>\n

Penetration and Blood Trails<\/h4>\n

Of course, you always need enough penetration and sometimes enough is more than it is at other times. The good thing is that when you need a bullet that penetrates deep it very often produces an exit wound. That\u2019s important\u00a0because bullets that penetrate deep damage less tissue and that extra blood on the ground will make the animal\u00a0easier to find.<\/p>\n

Dead is dead but I like the dead stuff I don\u2019t have to look for.<\/p>\n

My investigations will continue and as I learn I will share. In the mean time, after you pull the trigger, forget the bullet. There are better ways to discover how well it worked than admiring how pretty it is. Until the riddle is solved I expect you’ll still see photos of recovered bullets next to charts with all their unimportant\u00a0measurements. Simply saying the animal died in a hurry does just not seem analytical enough…Or does it?<\/p>\n

\"Bullet-6\"<\/a>
Unless you are into abstract art, this bullet is not pretty. But, it stopped a mature gemsbok, which only ran 60 yards after the shot. It retained only 62% of its original 85 grain weight. It was fired from a .243 Winchester.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There is a serious lack of understanding when it comes to terminal ballistics. This holds true whether we are talking about shooting animals or bad guys. A recent Facebook discussion resulted in a blog post by my esteemed colleague and arguing partner, Bryce Towsley. I don\u2019t agree with everything in his post \u2013 surprise \u2013 but there are some valid and factual …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2522],"tags":[2431,2429,2430,2139],"class_list":["post-11529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hunt","tag-energy-dump","tag-hunting-bullet-selection","tag-retained-bullet-weight","tag-terminal-bullet-performance"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5hujZ-2ZX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":11137,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/dummys-guide-to-ballistics\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":0},"title":"The Empty-Cases’ Dummy’s Guide to Ballistics","author":"gunwriter","date":"January 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Ballistics \u2013 internal, external, and terminal \u2013 is a very misunderstood subject. I\u2019ve been studying ballistics since before I killed my first deer. I understand the subject much better than I did then, but I\u2019m still no ballistician.\u00a0But I am an hillbilly, and hillbillies like to keep things simple. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DEFENSE"","block_context":{"text":"DEFENSE","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/defense\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/BAL-7.jpg?fit=999%2C388&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/BAL-7.jpg?fit=999%2C388&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/BAL-7.jpg?fit=999%2C388&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/BAL-7.jpg?fit=999%2C388&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":14744,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/a-little-bit-of-ballistics\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":1},"title":"A Little Bit of Ballistics","author":"gunwriter","date":"January 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"It\u2019s cold here in the hills. Temperatures have been in the single digits and the wind has been blowing hard. I have a variety of projects I need to be working on but they all involve shooting, and, well, I\u2019m holding out for better days. This has provided me with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "EDITORIAL"","block_context":{"text":"EDITORIAL","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/editorial\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/gel2.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/gel2.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/gel2.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/gel2.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":15808,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/federals-terminal-ascent-ammunition\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":2},"title":"Federal’s Terminal Ascent Ammunition","author":"gunwriter","date":"January 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"For the last several years the demand for rifle bullets that will fly flat, hit hard at distance, and still deliver desirable terminal performance has increased. We've seen several offerings attempting to fill this need. That's not a hard bullet to build. Where it gets complicated is creating a bullet\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Empty Cases Exclusive"","block_context":{"text":"Empty Cases Exclusive","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/empty-cases-exclusive\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/FTA-Thumbnail.jpg?fit=1000%2C558&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/FTA-Thumbnail.jpg?fit=1000%2C558&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/FTA-Thumbnail.jpg?fit=1000%2C558&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/FTA-Thumbnail.jpg?fit=1000%2C558&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13451,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/one-cartridge-for-the-world\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":3},"title":"One Cartridge for the World","author":"gunwriter","date":"June 6, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"If you were going to create one big game cartridge for the world\u00a0how would you codify the creation? Well, how about this? The cartridge should be able to push a bullet fast and flat enough to limit trajectory as much as possible. The bullet should provide enough penetration to pass\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "HUNTING"","block_context":{"text":"HUNTING","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/hunt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"308-5","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/308-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/308-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/308-5.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/308-5.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":8447,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/tactical-practical-penetration\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":4},"title":"Tactical \/ Practical Penetration","author":"gunwriter","date":"March 3, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"HERE is an interesting essay on defensive handgun ammo penetration over at Common Sense Tactical and Practical. I don't want to start a debate but I would like to add a comment from a man, Finn Aagaard, who probably knew more about terminal bullet performance than any one currently writing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DEFENSE"","block_context":{"text":"DEFENSE","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/defense\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"BB","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/BB-1024x302.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/BB-1024x302.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/BB-1024x302.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7336,"url":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/a-seriously-wicked-223-load\/","url_meta":{"origin":11529,"position":5},"title":"A Seriously Wicked 223 Load","author":"gunwriter","date":"July 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Lehigh Defense is known for their speciality ammunition. Loads like the 9mm Hero load and the only expanding subsonic .30 caliber bullet. But, they also make one devilishly wicked .223 Remington load. Its called the Controlled Chaos and chaos is exactly what it creates when it hits something. Look at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "DEFENSE"","block_context":{"text":"DEFENSE","link":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/category\/defense\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/223-Chaos-300x134.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11529"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11529\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11541,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11529\/revisions\/11541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empty-cases.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}